|
Home » Sermons Online
August 23, 2009
The 12th Sunday After Pentecost
Pastor Brad Davick
Leviticus 18:22; Romans
1:24-27
Kate, the Church-wide Assembly, and Hope-filled Grace
Kate was my best “girl” friend in the days of my youth growing
up in Minot, North Dakota. A fair-skinned, blue-eyed, blonde haired
Scandinavian, Kate and I were a pair of “crunchy granola” types before that
label even existed; our relationship found us sailing the waters of Lake
Sakakawea, backpacking through Glacier National Park, planning Magic City Ski
Club trips to the Rocky Mountains, cycling the trails of the local city parks,
doing our best to keep one another out of trouble walking Bourbon Street during
the 1976 National Youth Gathering.
Since our time together as crunchy granola’s, Kate and I have
continued our friendship. Kate called me one day while in college; she needed
a dress for a sorority formal and wanted to know if I’d fly home with her. As
Kate was a pilot with her own small plane, saying “Yes” and flying home for 24
hours was easier than driving home for a weekend. She dropped me off at my
Grandpa Davick’s home on her way to get the dress. Grandpa was in hospice
care dying of bone cancer. My flight home with Kate was the last time I saw my
grandfather.
After my divorce in 1989, I called Kate; needed a friendly voice
to talk with. She could tell I was having a hard time; said I needed to get
away from it all. We spent five days skiing together; Kate lived in Denver at
the time.
When I was in seminary, I’d meet Kate at the Minneapolis
Airport; by this time she was a captain for United Airlines and would
occasionally have a lay-over before her next flight.
That’s a brief glimpse of my dear friend Kate. I hope you have
a sense of the kind of relationship we share.
Kate called me earlier this summer. She wanted to know if I’d
baptize her twins, Bjorn and Lukas. Saying yes was easy; not merely because I
was completely flattered, but also because it would involve a quick trip to Las
Vegas, Kate’s new home.
Turns out that Kate and her partner Patricia wanted to have the
baptism in Minot. Most of Kate’s family is still there. Both Kate and
Patricia liked the notion of having their boys baptized where Kate was baptized
and confirmed; the same place where I was baptized and confirmed, and
handcuffed with her brother over a certain water balloon throwing incident.
Pastor Caroline, Ellie and I were in Minot three weeks ago. We
never made it to the church where Kate and I grew up. The baptism took place
in the Stav Kirche on the grounds of the Scandinavian Cultural Center. When
Kate and Patricia asked the current pastor of the church of our youth to have
Bjorn and Lukas baptized there, they were informed that the matter would have
to be brought before the church council. In effect, what was communicated
non-verbally is this: there exists a level of discomfort within this
congregation and its leadership baptizing your sons because of your lifestyle;
two christian women living in a monogamous, same-sex relationship.
I share this with you today as a way to frame today’s question,
“What is the ELCA position on homosexuality, on same-sex marriage?”
To address these questions, we begin with the bible readings we
heard this morning. Both the Old Testament reading in Leviticus and the New
Testament reading in Romans are the two readings that are most often lifted up
in conversation over the issue of homosexuality. Christians of a more
traditional bent are likely to quote both as evidence that God abhors homosexuality.
As Kathyrn Schifferdecker, Asst. Professor of Old Testament at Luther Seminary
states, “Christians of a more traditional bent, subscribe to a “plain-sense”
reading of the verses, especially with respect to the Leviticus reading; ‘you
shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination.’ What it says
is what it means... in plain-sense terms, a man shall not lie with a man.
[On the other hand] Christians with a more liberal bent counter
such plain-sense reading in a number of ways. They point out that today, we as
Christians, do not follow many aspects of the Levitical laws. For example, we
no longer follow the law against wearing clothing made from two different kinds
of cloth, nor do we refrain from lending money with interest. If we don’t
follow those laws, why follow this one about homosexual behavior?” There are
a number of other such arguments against the traditional interpretation of
verses like Leviticus 18:22 that merit consideration. In any case,
Schifferdecker concludes, “the church must continue to wrestle with these
verses, and with others, as it seeks discernment of God’s intent on this thorny
issue.”
In the same way, the reading from Romans tends to be lifted up
by Christians with a more traditional bent as evidence that God abhors
homosexuality. Interpreting with a plain-sense understanding, the reading is
difficult to argue.
On the other hand, those with a more liberal bent say that our
definition of what is “natural” and what is “unnatural” has changed significantly
in the last 2000 years, and that this passage has to do with a common practice
in the cultural context of New Testament antiquity that involved men and young
boys, and nothing to do with a committed, monogamous, same-gender
relationship. One of my New Testament professors at Luther Seminary, David
Fredrickson, in studying this reading in Romans concludes: "it is
anachronistic and inappropriate to think that Paul condemns homosexuality as
unnatural and praises heterosexuality as a reflection of the God-given order of
things."
So where does this leave us?
Since the inception of the ELCA in 1988, it has left us in a
decades long debate. Another chapter in this debate was written last week at
the ELCA’s Church-Wide Assembly in Minneapolis. Anticipating another chapter
being written, Pastor Caroline and I planned this topic for today.
On Wednesday, the Assembly adopted the social statement on
sexuality entitled, “Human Sexuality: Gift and Trust.” The 34-page social
statement actually touches on homosexuality only briefly, and is intended as a
sweeping definition of the ELCA's approach to matters of human sexuality. It
also sketches out the church's approach to gender, friendship, marriage and
children, cohabitation outside marriage, the commercialization of sexuality,
and the global sex trade.
In addition, it acknowledges what the Reverend Rebecca Larson,
Executive Director of the ELCA Church in Society Unit, described as an utter
lack of consensus toward homosexuality and same-sex relationships across the
ELCA's membership. She said the statement's drafters agreed that such differing
views could be accommodated because the homosexuality issue is "not
central to our faith," Larson said.
Beginning on Thursday and concluding on Friday, the Assembly
passed four resolutions on Ministry Policies relative to the adopted social
statement on human sexuality. The four resolutions will mean the following for
our corporate church:
In
the implementation of any resolutions on ministry policies, the ELCA will
commit itself to bear one another’s burdens, love the neighbor, and respect the
bound consciences of all; i.e., we will agree to disagree and maintain the
unity of the greater church for the sake of the gospel.
The
ELCA sill commit itself to finding ways to allow congregations that choose to
do so, to recognize, support and hold publicly accountable life-long,
monogamous, same-gender relationships; i.e., all for the blessing of
same-gender relationships.
The
ELCA will commit itself to finding a way for people in such publicly
accountable, lifelong, monogamous, same-gender relationships to serve as
rostered leaders of this church; i.e., allowing gay and lesbian persons to be
pastors within the ELCA with no restriction of celibacy.
The
ELCA will commit itself to finding ways that allow this church to continue to
trust congregations, bishops, synods and others responsible for determining who
should be called into public ministry; i.e., the decision to call gay, lesbian,
bisexual and transgendered persons, whether single or in publicly accountable,
life-long, monogamous, same-gender relationships will be at the discretion and
direction of the congregation, its bishop and its synod.
This is were we stand as of 36 hours ago.
At the conclusion of the final vote on the four resolutions on
Ministry Policies, sensing the joy and the sorrow in the assembly hall,
Presiding Bishop Mark Hanson read these words written in Colossians:
“As God’s chosen ones, holy and beloved, clothe yourselves
with compassion, kindness, humility, meekness, and patience. Bear with one
another and, if anyone has a complaint against another, forgive each other;
just as the Lord has forgiven you, you also must forgive. Above all, clothe
yourselves with love, which binds everything together in perfect harmony. And
let the peace of Christ rule in your hearts, to which indeed you were called in
the one body. And be thankful. Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly;
teach and admonish one another in all wisdom; and with gratitude in your hearts
sing psalms, hymns, and spiritual songs to God. And whatever you do, in word
or deed, do everything in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God the
Father through him.Colossians
3:12-17
Then Bishop Hanson offered this concluding remark:
“That passage gives invitation and expectation that those
deeply disappointed today will have the expectation and the freedom to continue
to admonish and to teach in this church. And so, too, those who have
experienced reconciliation today are called to humility. You are called to
clothe yourselves with love. But we are all called to let the peace of Christ
rule in our hearts remembering again and again that we are called in the one
body. I will invite you tomorrow afternoon into important, thoughtful,
prayerful conversations about what all of this means for our life together.
But what is absolutely important for me is that we have the conversation
together.
I am hope-filled that this will happen. I am hope-filled
because conversation and conflict, change and challenge are what makes us
Lutheran; such is our reforming heritage. And because of this week’s historic
actions, I am hope-filled that Kate and Patricia, Bjorn and Lukas, children of
God all, will know the joy of being welcomed into a community of faith... a
family of believers who do the very best they can to live the faith everyday.
Let us pray.
|